The Indelible Bonobo Experience

Renaissance Monkey: in-depth expertise in Jack-of-all-trading. I mostly comment on news of interest to me and occasionally engage in debates or troll passive-aggressively. Ask or Submit 2 mah authoritah! ;) !

ANDROID is going from strength to strength. Around 600m of the nearly 2 billion smartphones ever sold use Google’s mobile operating system, estimates Horace Dediu, the boss of Asymco, a mobile-analysis firm. How odd, then, that nearly three-fifths of those that remain in active use, both old and new, rely on outdated versions of it. That is partly because old gizmos do not have enough oomph to run the latest iteration, called Android 4, and partly the outgrowth of Google’s choice to exercise only loose control over its operating system after each new version is released. The worrying consequence is that a vast number of phones do not receive software fixes, known as patches. Worse, many cannot be patched even if the owner wants to, says Rich Mogull, boss of Securiosis, an independent security-research firm. (..) As a result, tens of millions of phones run the version of the operating system with which they were shipped, perhaps with one or two minor tweaks. Even phones with the chips and memory to handle upgrades often do not receive them because of the support costs: handset-makers and carriers prefer to have consumers buy new phones than to provide technical support for old or outdated models.

Why Do Americans Hate Android And Love Apple?

futurejournalismproject:

ReadWrite’s Dan Lyons points to a disturbing trend in tech journalism as he tries to unwrap why iPhones have such significant US marketshare while the rest of the world runs 75% Android.

Android, goes a coverage tick, is for poor people:

But Apple and its cheerleaders in the States don’t just criticize Android phones; they also criticize Android users, depicting them as low-class people who are uneducated, poor, cheap and too lacking in “taste” (a favorite Apple fanboy word) to pay for an Apple product and instead willing to settle for a low-price knockoff.

See, for example, a recent story by Sam Biddle on Gizmodo called “Android Is Popular Because It’s Cheap, Not Because It’s Good,” illustrated with a photo of a homeless man sleeping next to a shopping cart and bags full of collected cans. Nice touch!… Apparently inspired by this article, John Biggs of TechCrunch picked up the “Android is cheap” meme and ran with it too…

…[I]n America, a noisy chorus of pro-Apple bloggers keeps repeating the mantra about Android being cheap and crappy and second-rate, and people keep believing it and insisting that they must have an iPhone. American consumers have been told that those Android smartphones are hard to use, or complicated, or geeky, or unreliable, and, worst of all, on top of all that, they’re made for poor people. 

And that’s where the rhetoric starts to border on something ugly. Look at what Apple fans were saying in April 2012 when Instagram became available on Android. Cult of Mac had a nice roundup which included sneering tweets about Walmart and “poor peasants” and “riff raff” and “poor people,” but also included these:

  • “It’s like when all the ghetto people started coming to the nice suburbs. Instagram was our nice lil suburb.”
  • “Instagram just got a whole lotta ghetto.”

The italics are mine, and I’ve added them for a reason. Yes, it’s the dreaded G word, and it comes up again in a Dec. 13, 2011 article by Glenn Derene, who wrote that “Android’s Cheap, Low Quality Apps Make It Feel Like A Technological Ghetto.”

Related: Henry Blodget, founder of Business Insider, writes about the horrors of flying economy. Evidently, he couldn’t charge his laptop, there was no wifi and the food was bad.

paying more to feel smart - isn’t that what all smartphones are about? :)

WhatsApp, a messenger service for people with Android phones, violates internationally adopted privacy regulations, said the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. When someone installs WhatsApp on their phone, it searches through the user’s address book to find which friends who are also using the service. But when it’s done, WhatsApp retains all those phone numbers, even the ones from people who never signed up for the app in the first place. What’s more, the joint investigation by Canada’s privacy commissioner and the Dutch Data Protection Authority found WhatsApp uses unencrypted messages, “leaving them prone to eavesdropping or interception.” “Our investigation has led to WhatsApp making and committing to make further changes in order to better protect users’ personal information,” said privacy commissioner Jennifer Stoddart, in a statement. However, Jacob Kohnstamm, Stoddart’s Dutch counterpart, added: “But we are not completely satisfied yet. The investigation revealed that users of WhatsApp - apart from iPhone users who have iOS 6 software - do not have a choice to use the app without granting access to their entire address book. The address book contains phone numbers of both users and non-users. This lack of choice contravenes (Dutch and Canadian) privacy law. Both users and non-users should have control over their personal data and users must be able to freely decide what contact details they wish to share with WhatsApp.” (via Canadian privacy commissioner blasts WhatsApp | News | Tech | Toronto Sun)
will there be a fine?

WhatsApp, a messenger service for people with Android phones, violates internationally adopted privacy regulations, said the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. When someone installs WhatsApp on their phone, it searches through the user’s address book to find which friends who are also using the service. But when it’s done, WhatsApp retains all those phone numbers, even the ones from people who never signed up for the app in the first place. What’s more, the joint investigation by Canada’s privacy commissioner and the Dutch Data Protection Authority found WhatsApp uses unencrypted messages, “leaving them prone to eavesdropping or interception.” “Our investigation has led to WhatsApp making and committing to make further changes in order to better protect users’ personal information,” said privacy commissioner Jennifer Stoddart, in a statement. However, Jacob Kohnstamm, Stoddart’s Dutch counterpart, added: “But we are not completely satisfied yet. The investigation revealed that users of WhatsApp - apart from iPhone users who have iOS 6 software - do not have a choice to use the app without granting access to their entire address book. The address book contains phone numbers of both users and non-users. This lack of choice contravenes (Dutch and Canadian) privacy law. Both users and non-users should have control over their personal data and users must be able to freely decide what contact details they wish to share with WhatsApp.” (via Canadian privacy commissioner blasts WhatsApp | News | Tech | Toronto Sun)

will there be a fine?