The Indelible Bonobo Experience

Renaissance Monkey: in-depth expertise in Jack-of-all-trading. I mostly comment on news of interest to me and occasionally engage in debates or troll passive-aggressively. Ask or Submit 2 mah authoritah! ;) !

The death toll cancer takes in Canada is on the decline, fuelled in large part by the fact that lung cancer is killing fewer Canadian men than it did in earlier decades, the Canadian Cancer Society said Wednesday. (via wpf)
In its annual report on cancer in Canada, the agency estimated that close to 100,000 lives have been saved in this country over the past 20 years because of the declining cancer death rate.
In part that is due to improved cancer survival rates. There have been advances in treatments for several types of cancer, meaning more Canadians are surviving prostate, breast and colorectal cancer as well as for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, said Gillian Bromfield, the cancer society’s director of cancer control policy. 
But the biggest factor in the lowering of the death rate is not cancer survival, it’s cancer prevention. Fewer men have developed lung cancer in recent years because more men either stopped smoking or never picked up the habit. That trend started decades ago and the benefits are being seen now. 
That said, lung cancer is still the No. 1 cancer killer of men and women in Canada. The Cancer Society estimates it kills 20,100 Canadians each year. Tobacco is implicated in other cancers as well and is believed to cause 37,000 Canadian deaths each year.
The tide on smoking turned for Canadian men in the 1960s. From a peak of 61 per cent in 1965, the rate of men who smoke dropped to 20 per cent in 2010.  But the trend towards kicking the habit was slower to start among Canadian women. The Canadian Cancer Society said it was another two decades before the smoking rate among Canadian women started to drop in the same way as it had in men. By 2010, only 14 per cent of Canadian women smoked.
The cancer report estimates that 186,400 new cases of cancer will be diagnosed in Canada in 2012 and 75,700 Canadians will die from the disease. Almost 70 per cent of the new cancer cases will be found in Canadians aged 50 to 79. 
The incidence — new cases — of breast cancer has been declining, but the rate of deaths to breast cancers has dropped even more sharply, declining by almost 40 per cent since peaking in 1986. In fact, the report said the breast cancer death rate in Canada is the lowest it has been since 1950. 
Good news all-around.

The death toll cancer takes in Canada is on the decline, fuelled in large part by the fact that lung cancer is killing fewer Canadian men than it did in earlier decades, the Canadian Cancer Society said Wednesday. (via wpf)

  • In its annual report on cancer in Canada, the agency estimated that close to 100,000 lives have been saved in this country over the past 20 years because of the declining cancer death rate.
  • In part that is due to improved cancer survival rates. There have been advances in treatments for several types of cancer, meaning more Canadians are surviving prostate, breast and colorectal cancer as well as for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, said Gillian Bromfield, the cancer society’s director of cancer control policy.
  • But the biggest factor in the lowering of the death rate is not cancer survival, it’s cancer prevention. Fewer men have developed lung cancer in recent years because more men either stopped smoking or never picked up the habit. That trend started decades ago and the benefits are being seen now.
  • That said, lung cancer is still the No. 1 cancer killer of men and women in Canada. The Cancer Society estimates it kills 20,100 Canadians each year. Tobacco is implicated in other cancers as well and is believed to cause 37,000 Canadian deaths each year.
  • The tide on smoking turned for Canadian men in the 1960s. From a peak of 61 per cent in 1965, the rate of men who smoke dropped to 20 per cent in 2010.  But the trend towards kicking the habit was slower to start among Canadian women. The Canadian Cancer Society said it was another two decades before the smoking rate among Canadian women started to drop in the same way as it had in men. By 2010, only 14 per cent of Canadian women smoked.
  • The cancer report estimates that 186,400 new cases of cancer will be diagnosed in Canada in 2012 and 75,700 Canadians will die from the disease. Almost 70 per cent of the new cancer cases will be found in Canadians aged 50 to 79.
  • The incidence — new cases — of breast cancer has been declining, but the rate of deaths to breast cancers has dropped even more sharply, declining by almost 40 per cent since peaking in 1986. In fact, the report said the breast cancer death rate in Canada is the lowest it has been since 1950.
Good news all-around.
Clean eating means choosing fruits, vegetables, and meats that are raised, grown, and sold with minimal processing. Often they’re organic, and rarely (if ever) should they contain additives.

7 Foods You Should Never Eat | Fox News

  • 1. Canned Tomatoes (leaching BPA)
    The solution: Choose tomatoes in glass bottles (which do not need resin linings), such as the brands Bionaturae and Coluccio. You can also get several types in Tetra Pak boxes, like Trader Joe’s and Pomi.
    Budget tip: If your recipe allows, substitute bottled pasta sauce for canned tomatoes. Look for pasta sauces with low sodium and few added ingredients, or you may have to adjust the recipe.
  • 2. Corn-Fed Beef - 
    The problem: Cattle evolved to eat grass, not grains. A recent comprehensive study conducted by the USDA and researchers from Clemson University found that compared with corn-fed beef, grass-fed beef is higher in beta-carotene, vitamin E, omega-3s, conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), calcium, magnesium, and potassium; lower in inflammatory omega-6s; and lower in saturated fats that have been linked to heart disease.
    The solution: Buy grass-fed beef, which can be found at specialty grocers, farmers’ markets, and nationally at Whole Foods. It’s usually labeled because it demands a premium, but if you don’t see it, ask your butcher.
    Budget tip: Cuts on the bone are cheaper because processors charge extra for deboning. You can also buy direct from a local farmer, which can be as cheap as $5 per pound. To find a farmer near you, search eatwild.com. 
  • 3. Microwave Popcorn
    The problem: Chemicals, including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), in the lining of the bag, are part of a class of compounds that may be linked to infertility in humans, according to a recent study from UCLA. In animal testing, the chemicals cause liver, testicular, and pancreatic cancer. Studies show that microwaving causes the chemicals to vaporize—and migrate into your popcorn. “They stay in your body for years and accumulate there,” says Naidenko, which is why researchers worry that levels in humans could approach the amounts causing cancers in laboratory animals. DuPont and other manufacturers have promised to phase out PFOA by 2015 under a voluntary EPA plan, but millions of bags of popcorn will be sold between now and then.
    The solution: Pop natural kernels the old-fashioned way: in a skillet. For flavorings, you can add real butter or dried seasonings, such as dillweed, vegetable flakes, or soup mix.
    Budget tip: Popping your own popcorn is dirt cheap
  • 4. Nonorganic Potatoes
    The problem: Root vegetables absorb herbicides, pesticides, and fungicides that wind up in soil. In the case of potatoes—the nation’s most popular vegetable—they’re treated with fungicides during the growing season, then sprayed with herbicides to kill off the fibrous vines before harvesting. After they’re dug up, the potatoes are treated yet again to prevent them from sprouting. “Try this experiment: Buy a conventional potato in a store, and try to get it to sprout. It won’t,” says Moyer, who is also farm director of the Rodale Institute (also owned by Rodale Inc., the publisher of Prevention). “I’ve talked with potato growers who say point-blank they would never eat the potatoes they sell. They have separate plots where they grow potatoes for themselves without all the chemicals.”
    The solution: Buy organic potatoes. Washing isn’t good enough if you’re trying to remove chemicals that have been absorbed into the flesh.
    Budget tip: Organic potatoes are only $1 to $2 a pound, slightly more expensive than conventional spuds.
  • 5.  Farmed Salmon
    The problem: Nature didn’t intend for salmon to be crammed into pens and fed soy, poultry litter, and hydrolyzed chicken feathers. As a result, farmed salmon is lower in vitamin D and higher in contaminants, including carcinogens, PCBs, brominated flame retardants, and pesticides such as dioxin and DDT. According to Carpenter, the most contaminated fish come from Northern Europe, which can be found on American menus. “You could eat one of these salmon dinners every 5 months without increasing your risk of cancer,” says Carpenter, whose 2004 fish contamination study got broad media attention. “It’s that bad.” Preliminary science has also linked DDT to diabetes and obesity, but some nutritionists believe the benefits of omega-3s outweigh the risks. There is also concern about the high level of antibiotics and pesticides used to treat these fish. When you eat farmed salmon, you get dosed with the same drugs and chemicals.
    The solution: Switch to wild-caught Alaska salmon. If the package says fresh Atlantic, it’s farmed. There are no commercial fisheries left for wild Atlantic salmon.
    Budget tip: Canned salmon, almost exclusively from wild catch, can be found for as little as $3 a can.
  • 6. Milk Produced With Artificial Hormones
    The problem: Milk producers treat their dairy cattle with recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH or rBST, as it is also known) to boost milk production. But rBGH also increases udder infections and even pus in the milk. It also leads to higher levels of a hormone called insulin-like growth factor in milk. In people, high levels of IGF-1 may contribute to breast, prostate, and colon cancers. “When the government approved rBGH, it was thought that IGF-1 from milk would be broken down in the human digestive tract,” says North. As it turns out, the casein in milk protects most of it, according to several independent studies. “There’s not 100 percent proof that this is increasing cancer in humans,” admits North. “However, it’s banned in most industrialized countries.”
    The solution: Check labels for rBGH-free, rBST-free, produced without artificial hormones, or organic milk. These phrases indicate rBGH-free products.
    Budget tip: Try Wal-Mart’s Great Value label, which does not use rBGH. 
  • 7.  Conventional Apples
    The problem: If fall fruits held a “most doused in pesticides contest,” apples would win. Why? They are individually grafted (descended from a single tree) so that each variety maintains its distinctive flavor. As such, apples don’t develop resistance to pests and are sprayed frequently. The industry maintains that these residues are not harmful. But Kastel counters that it’s just common sense to minimize exposure by avoiding the most doused produce, like apples. “Farm workers have higher rates of many cancers,” he says. And increasing numbers of studies are starting to link a higher body burden of pesticides (from all sources) with Parkinson’s disease.
    The solution: Buy organic apples.
    Budget tip: If you can’t afford organic, be sure to wash and peel them. But Kastel personally refuses to compromise. “I would rather see the trade-off being that I don’t buy that expensive electronic gadget,” he says. “Just a few of these decisions will accommodate an organic diet for a family.”
I didn’t know about popcorn, though I knew that the vapor causes an unusual form of lung cancer.
It’s lovely to hear from people when you’re ill. But it’s also lovely when they add: “No need to reply.” The biggest shock, when I was diagnosed with cancer the summer before last, was quickly observing that people can be quite competitive in their determination to “be there for you”, and occasionally unable to hide their chagrin when some other chum has been awarded a particularly sensitive role at a particularly sensitive medical consultation. (via 10 things not to say to someone when they’re ill | Life and style | The Guardian)
“I feel so sorry for you” Do say: “I so wish you didn’t have to go through this ghastly time.” That acknowledges that you are still a sentient being, an active participant in your own drama, not just, all of a sudden, A Helpless Victim. 
“If anyone can beat this, it’s you” Do say: “My mum had this 20 years ago, and she’s in Bengal now, travelling with an acrobatic circus.” (Though not if that isn’t true.)  
“You’re looking well”
“You’re looking terrible”
“Let me know the results”If people do want to talk about such matters, they really need to be allowed some control over when, how and to whom. Contacting their very nearest and dearest instead is fine, as is volunteering to spread the bad tidings to others who are also anxious.  
“Whatever I can do to help”But “Can I pick the children up from school on Tuesdays?” or “Can I come round with a fish pie and a Mad Men box set?” is greatly preferable to: “Can I saddle you with the further responsibility of thinking up a task for me?”  
“Oh, no, your worries are unfounded”
“What does chemotherapy [for example] feel like?”
“I really must see you”  the planning thing is an arse. I liked it when people just said, “Can I come by after work this evening?” or, even better, “I’ve got tickets to the theatre on the 25th. Tell me on the day if you can face it.”
“I’m so terribly upset about your condition”  don’t send your ailing chum a passionate storm of your own wild grief, personally delivered. It’s a little too needy, under the circs.

Reading this, it seems that no matter what you say it’s bad..

It’s lovely to hear from people when you’re ill. But it’s also lovely when they add: “No need to reply.” The biggest shock, when I was diagnosed with cancer the summer before last, was quickly observing that people can be quite competitive in their determination to “be there for you”, and occasionally unable to hide their chagrin when some other chum has been awarded a particularly sensitive role at a particularly sensitive medical consultation. (via 10 things not to say to someone when they’re ill | Life and style | The Guardian)

  1. “I feel so sorry for you” Do say: “I so wish you didn’t have to go through this ghastly time.” That acknowledges that you are still a sentient being, an active participant in your own drama, not just, all of a sudden, A Helpless Victim. 
  2. “If anyone can beat this, it’s you”
     Do say: “My mum had this 20 years ago, and she’s in Bengal now, travelling with an acrobatic circus.” (Though not if that isn’t true.)  
  3. “You’re looking well”
  4. “You’re looking terrible”
  5. “Let me know the results”
    If people do want to talk about such matters, they really need to be allowed some control over when, how and to whom. Contacting their very nearest and dearest instead is fine, as is volunteering to spread the bad tidings to others who are also anxious.  
  6. “Whatever I can do to help”
    But “Can I pick the children up from school on Tuesdays?” or “Can I come round with a fish pie and a Mad Men box set?” is greatly preferable to: “Can I saddle you with the further responsibility of thinking up a task for me?”  
  7. “Oh, no, your worries are unfounded”
  8. “What does chemotherapy [for example] feel like?”
  9. “I really must see you”  the planning thing is an arse. I liked it when people just said, “Can I come by after work this evening?” or, even better, “I’ve got tickets to the theatre on the 25th. Tell me on the day if you can face it.”
  10. “I’m so terribly upset about your condition”  don’t send your ailing chum a passionate storm of your own wild grief, personally delivered. It’s a little too needy, under the circs.
Reading this, it seems that no matter what you say it’s bad..