The Indelible Bonobo Experience

Renaissance Monkey: in-depth expertise in Jack-of-all-trading. I mostly comment on news of interest to me and occasionally engage in debates or troll passive-aggressively. Ask or Submit 2 mah authoritah! ;) !

“And then, suddenly, it wasn’t.”
We had made a mistake. All of our energy had been thrown into life: how to minimise pain, how to make her comfortable. What we didn’t realise was that a single piece of bureaucracy would transform the time in the immediate aftermath of her death from one of private adjustment into a distressing wrangle for which neither of us had the emotional budget.
What you need to know is this: if a person has not seen their GP in the 14 days preceding their death, or is not seen by them immediately afterwards, the case must be referred to the coroner.
That “immediately afterwards” bit is important. If the death happens outside surgery hours – in the night, say, or at the weekend – and you reach for the phone and find yourself visited by a different doctor, even one from the same practice, the case will go to the coroner. Even if the death was entirely expected.
“It is really to make sure, if the person is not seen by a doctor who has cared for them as a patient, that the correct cause of death is entered on the death certificate,” explains a Home Office spokesman.
But when that happens, your private moment of grief is hijacked by the relentless machinery of the state, which can be incredibly distressing.
My grandma, Myra, was 90 when she died. She had been almost impossibly well her entire life, despite a diet heavy in purple Silk Cut, but fell ill just before Christmas. What we had hoped was flu turned into something much worse. She was admitted to hospital for the first time in her life and when she came out, in mid-February, three weeks before she died, she had a big box of pills, an oxygen machine and a thick file of medical notes. These chronicled several life-threatening conditions, including pulmonary fibrosis (scarring of the lung tissue, which is a progressive disease), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, another chronic lung condition), and heart problems.
We were almost demented with tiredness. I’d been up all night at my grandma’s bedside. Mum had barely slept for days. We wanted now some quiet time in the house, hanging out with Grandma, to collect ourselves.
Instead, shortly after 7am, a policewoman arrived. She had been notified by the duty doctor. She wanted to ask questions about how Grandma had died, which we dealt with easily enough. Then she explained that she must now call the duty undertakers (not, note, the undertakers of our choice), who would come immediately to cart my grandma off to the morgue at the local hospital awaiting the coroner’s decision – at which point all hell broke loose.
(via T)
When I cared for a dying relative, I requested an autopsy. The coroner office took over an almost a week later told me that they weren’t going to do it. :(

“And then, suddenly, it wasn’t.”

  • We had made a mistake. All of our energy had been thrown into life: how to minimise pain, how to make her comfortable. What we didn’t realise was that a single piece of bureaucracy would transform the time in the immediate aftermath of her death from one of private adjustment into a distressing wrangle for which neither of us had the emotional budget.
  • What you need to know is this: if a person has not seen their GP in the 14 days preceding their death, or is not seen by them immediately afterwards, the case must be referred to the coroner.
  • That “immediately afterwards” bit is important. If the death happens outside surgery hours – in the night, say, or at the weekend – and you reach for the phone and find yourself visited by a different doctor, even one from the same practice, the case will go to the coroner. Even if the death was entirely expected.
  • “It is really to make sure, if the person is not seen by a doctor who has cared for them as a patient, that the correct cause of death is entered on the death certificate,” explains a Home Office spokesman.
  • But when that happens, your private moment of grief is hijacked by the relentless machinery of the state, which can be incredibly distressing.
  • My grandma, Myra, was 90 when she died. She had been almost impossibly well her entire life, despite a diet heavy in purple Silk Cut, but fell ill just before Christmas. What we had hoped was flu turned into something much worse. She was admitted to hospital for the first time in her life and when she came out, in mid-February, three weeks before she died, she had a big box of pills, an oxygen machine and a thick file of medical notes. These chronicled several life-threatening conditions, including pulmonary fibrosis (scarring of the lung tissue, which is a progressive disease), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, another chronic lung condition), and heart problems.
  • We were almost demented with tiredness. I’d been up all night at my grandma’s bedside. Mum had barely slept for days. We wanted now some quiet time in the house, hanging out with Grandma, to collect ourselves.
  • Instead, shortly after 7am, a policewoman arrived. She had been notified by the duty doctor. She wanted to ask questions about how Grandma had died, which we dealt with easily enough. Then she explained that she must now call the duty undertakers (not, note, the undertakers of our choice), who would come immediately to cart my grandma off to the morgue at the local hospital awaiting the coroner’s decision – at which point all hell broke loose.
(via T)
When I cared for a dying relative, I requested an autopsy. The coroner office took over an almost a week later told me that they weren’t going to do it. :(
A committee of the National Assembly unanimously recommended Thursday that rules be established to shelter from prosecution doctors who offer terminally-ill patients “medical assistance to die.”The Criminal Code of Canada prohibits euthanasia, making it an offence to counsel or assist someone to commit suicide, or to agree to be put to death.
‘Medical aid’ to die endorsed

I’m a bit torn about this.. I can easily see doctors helping to die —for money— people who might need a different kind of help, or helping spouses finish off their significant others in order to collect a life insurance premium or simply their wealth.

The report noted that this is what Quebec did in 1976, when the province’s attorney-general ordered an end to prosecutions for abortion. Abortions remained a criminal offence in Canada until 1988, but prosecutions in Quebec ceased 12 years earlier, and other provinces followed its example. “I think it is possible to do,” Claude Provencher, director-general of the Quebec Bar Association, said Thursday.

Canada: Global News Live Blogging Promotion of Killing Disabled Kids Tonight

politicalcanuck:

youneedacat:

Tonight (March 16) Global News is doing a ‘live blog’ promoting the killing of children with disabilities. The Canadian news network is calling it a ‘discussion,’ but they’re misleading people. They have a three-person panel. The first person is convicted killer Robert Latimer, who killed his 12-year-old daughter Tracy by gassing her in the cab of his truck. There is a woman who has two institutionalized sons and wants to be able to - I guess “put them down” would be the term. They also have ‘ethicist’ Arthur Schafer, who is on record as being in favor about just about any killing of old, ill or disabled persons as long as the killer says they did it out of mercy.

The live blog is starting at 8:00 pm EST and will run until midnight. They are already taking comments (which run by a moderator.

Follow the link and you’ll find direct links to comment on the discussion. Please do if you can manage it. This is horrifying. Note that lots of disabled commenters are not seeing our comments coming through. (And for those who actually think this is ever okay — this is killing people who never asked to die, where it’s just assumed, in the face of much evidence to the contrary, that we’d want to die. I say we because I fit well into the demographic this happens to.)

For reference, Arthur Schafer argued in favour of Robert Latimer (one of the other panelists) being set free.  Which makes this ridiculous biased and circle-jerk panel, and obviously so to anyone who takes two seconds to use google.  Sadly, that probably won’t be a lot of people.

At least TRY and show both sides of the story, Global News.

I am very much torn by this issue. On the one hand, people should have the right to suicide - whether “assisted” or not, that’s a different debate I don’t want to go into. With children, it’s tough because they often don’t have the “cognitive tools” to make such a decision, but their parents do.

The problem I have with euthanasia in Canada is that it’s often administered to unwilling adults and nobody seems to care. We have numerous cancer patients, some as young as 40 and 50 who are deemed “unsalvageable” by some doctor (often bribed by a family member who’s in the will) who are then slowly killed with huge radiation doses deemed “palliative” (i.e., with no hope of successful treatment, just to shorten life). Once that person is beyond recovery, the decision is made to “curb their suffering”. The problem is that such cancers are often treatable and for many of the people such killed, there are relatives willing to care for them so that they are not in any way a “drag” on the rest of the society.

Based on what I have seen in Canadian hospitals, the warning signals some tried to raise in USA about “death by committee” is a reality here.